X-Men: Days of Future Past
Genre: Action, Adventure, Sci-Fi
Main Players: Hugh Jackman, James McAvoy, Michael Fassbender, Jennifer Lawrence (and a whole crew of others)
General Gist: Wolverine travels to the past to try and change the fate of humans and mutants.
Deb's Take:
I think I have mentioned recently that I haven't always been a big "superhero" movie fan. Over the last year or so Tiff and I have been to a lot of these movies. The Marvel/Superhero genre has been on a big upswing, or so it seems. I have found myself much more inclined to going and more impressed with what I see. I will always be a drama, romantic girl at heart, but I have an open mind and find these movies quite entertaining as well. As far as X-men, I was introduced to these characters about 20 years ago. There was a Saturday morning cartoon that came on and my husband always got up to watch it..(even before kids!) I took an interest and was intrigued.
I liked this one! There was a different twist. This one had a lot of Hugh Jackman, and he's a fine man to see a lot of. The movie kept my attention with all the action, and the characters played their parts well. James McAvoy was impressive in his role. I liked all the actors quite honestly. It's a superhero movie so the ending is pretty predictable, but after two weeks of boredom this movie hit the spot.
Deb's Rate: Friday Night
Tiff's Take:
I never make going to X-Men movies a priority but I'm not sure why. I've seen enough of them so far to realize that I thoroughly enjoy them. I don't think there's been one I haven't liked. This one was no exception.
Hugh Jackman does an amazing job as Wolverine and I'm always majorly impressed with how he can bulk up for this role. I know he's not super old but he's no young buck either. The fact that he can get so ripped is, well, impressive. And easy on the eyes.
I am a huge fan of Jennifer Lawrence so she can really do no wrong in my eye. I liked her as Mystique. Like Deb, I liked all the actors. They all were great in their roles and this movie was entertaining in every way. Can't go wrong with an X-Men movie. One of these days I'll remember that.
Tiff's Rate: Friday Night
Preview: Maleficent
Showing posts with label Hugh Jackman. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Hugh Jackman. Show all posts
Thursday, June 12, 2014
Tuesday, January 8, 2013
2012: Week 52: Les Miserables
Les Miserables
Genre: Musical, Drama
Main Players: Hugh Jackman, Russell Crowe, Anne Hathaway, Amanda Seyfried, Eddie Redmayne, Sacha Baron Cohen, Helena Bonham Carter
General Gist: "Ex-prisoner Jean Valjean is hunted for decades by the ruthless policeman Javert after he breaks parole. When Valjean agrees to care for factory worker Fantine's young daughter, Cosette, their lives change forever" (taken from movies.yahoo.com)
Deb's Take:
I have never seen this in any way, shape or form. I was super excited to see it. First off, the movie is long...really, I felt it was too long. I suppose it mimics the on stage performance, but I got tired of it. Second, I got tired of the singing/chanting. I know it's a musical, but I really like more of a part sing, part speak show. Third, I was amazed at the performance and singing of the actors. I think they did a great job, and all the characters were wonderfully cast. Unfortunately, I think this movie should have been left on the stage. I think some of it's character and charm was lost as a movie. Don't get me wrong, the movie was exceptional in scenes, sets, costumes, etc...but sometimes I think leaving the arts in their true form is just as well.
Deb's Rate: Rent it (in case you need to pause for a short break)
Tiff's Take:
Yes, this movie was long. But I'm not sure there was really a way to get around that. A "big" movie like this with a lot of hype is bound to be long, right? This was my first time as well to see any form of Les Mis. Mainly because I'm not a huge musical person so I've never made a point to see it on stage. After seeing this I don't really think I will make a point to go that extra step. Not because I thought it was horrible though, but because seeing a dramatic, musical once is probably enough for me.
And full on musical it was. No talking at all. Just singing. The entire time. A little much for me. But I did enjoy the story even if it was a little depressing. The acting was great and the singing was for the most part great. I would be curious to hear what someone thought who had seen the musical on stage. Did it do it a huge injustice?? Or was it a great interpretation? I'm sure personally I'll never know but I'm glad I did see it even if it wasn't exactly my cup of tea.
Tiff's Rate: Matinee
Preview: One more to come for 2012!
Genre: Musical, Drama
Main Players: Hugh Jackman, Russell Crowe, Anne Hathaway, Amanda Seyfried, Eddie Redmayne, Sacha Baron Cohen, Helena Bonham Carter
General Gist: "Ex-prisoner Jean Valjean is hunted for decades by the ruthless policeman Javert after he breaks parole. When Valjean agrees to care for factory worker Fantine's young daughter, Cosette, their lives change forever" (taken from movies.yahoo.com)
Deb's Take:
I have never seen this in any way, shape or form. I was super excited to see it. First off, the movie is long...really, I felt it was too long. I suppose it mimics the on stage performance, but I got tired of it. Second, I got tired of the singing/chanting. I know it's a musical, but I really like more of a part sing, part speak show. Third, I was amazed at the performance and singing of the actors. I think they did a great job, and all the characters were wonderfully cast. Unfortunately, I think this movie should have been left on the stage. I think some of it's character and charm was lost as a movie. Don't get me wrong, the movie was exceptional in scenes, sets, costumes, etc...but sometimes I think leaving the arts in their true form is just as well.
Deb's Rate: Rent it (in case you need to pause for a short break)
Tiff's Take:
Yes, this movie was long. But I'm not sure there was really a way to get around that. A "big" movie like this with a lot of hype is bound to be long, right? This was my first time as well to see any form of Les Mis. Mainly because I'm not a huge musical person so I've never made a point to see it on stage. After seeing this I don't really think I will make a point to go that extra step. Not because I thought it was horrible though, but because seeing a dramatic, musical once is probably enough for me.
And full on musical it was. No talking at all. Just singing. The entire time. A little much for me. But I did enjoy the story even if it was a little depressing. The acting was great and the singing was for the most part great. I would be curious to hear what someone thought who had seen the musical on stage. Did it do it a huge injustice?? Or was it a great interpretation? I'm sure personally I'll never know but I'm glad I did see it even if it wasn't exactly my cup of tea.
Tiff's Rate: Matinee
Preview: One more to come for 2012!
Wednesday, December 26, 2012
2012: Week 49: Rise of the Guardians
Rise of the Guardians
Genre: Animation, Adventure
Main Players: Voices of Chris Pine, Alec Baldwin, Jude Law, Isla Fisher, Hugh Jackman
General Gist: The immortal guardians (Jack Frost, Easter Bunny, Tooth Fairy, Sandman, and Santa) try to protect all the children against the evil spirit Pitch.
Tiff's Take:
We decided to treat the kids to a movie for week 49. My kids wanted to see this and it looked interesting to me so why not. And I did enjoy it but I wouldn't say it was anything spectacular. I've seen a lot better animated movies but I've also seen a lot worse.
It was an interesting concept and I liked all the characters. All the great voices helped too. But I'll admit it hasn't left a lasting impression since I've seen it a few weeks ago. My kids? My 7 year old seemed to enjoy it and my 4 year old was only mildly distracted at times. Pretty good for a kids movie I'd say.
Tiff's Rate: Matinee
Deb's Take: I like animated movies when they have a lot of humor for the adults, at least they are my favorite. This movie didn't have a lot of "hidden" adult moments. However, the story was a good concept, and I liked that they combined a group of guardians together that weren't just your traditional characters, (ie: Jack Frost and Tooth Fairy) The movie kept the kids' interest (mine are 9 and 12) and I think the story was laid out well. My kids both said they liked it "a lot" (vs a little). It was good, clean, kid fun!
Deb's Rate: Matinee
Preview: A few reviews in the que. Only a couple weeks behind. Whew!
Genre: Animation, Adventure
Main Players: Voices of Chris Pine, Alec Baldwin, Jude Law, Isla Fisher, Hugh Jackman
General Gist: The immortal guardians (Jack Frost, Easter Bunny, Tooth Fairy, Sandman, and Santa) try to protect all the children against the evil spirit Pitch.
Tiff's Take:
We decided to treat the kids to a movie for week 49. My kids wanted to see this and it looked interesting to me so why not. And I did enjoy it but I wouldn't say it was anything spectacular. I've seen a lot better animated movies but I've also seen a lot worse.
It was an interesting concept and I liked all the characters. All the great voices helped too. But I'll admit it hasn't left a lasting impression since I've seen it a few weeks ago. My kids? My 7 year old seemed to enjoy it and my 4 year old was only mildly distracted at times. Pretty good for a kids movie I'd say.
Tiff's Rate: Matinee
Deb's Take: I like animated movies when they have a lot of humor for the adults, at least they are my favorite. This movie didn't have a lot of "hidden" adult moments. However, the story was a good concept, and I liked that they combined a group of guardians together that weren't just your traditional characters, (ie: Jack Frost and Tooth Fairy) The movie kept the kids' interest (mine are 9 and 12) and I think the story was laid out well. My kids both said they liked it "a lot" (vs a little). It was good, clean, kid fun!
Deb's Rate: Matinee
Preview: A few reviews in the que. Only a couple weeks behind. Whew!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)